- TRIMPS GAME REVIEW FULL
- TRIMPS GAME REVIEW PROFESSIONAL
TRIMPS GAME REVIEW FULL
WE DO NOT count player beats of recovery in full team practice for tactical drills. We provide this recovery feedback during conditioning drills with healthy-scratch players and injured players performing a reconditioning program. The color-coding system of HR zones allows us to see beats of recovery during the rest period and gives an indicator to the coaches when full recovery is reached and the next repetition may begin. The Max HR number is not concerning to us and we recognize every individual will be different. % of MAX HR: During training we find it more valuable to look at this metric as a measure of HR recovery between drills.The “pumping” type modalities allow for circulation and lymphatic drainage of post-workout byproducts. When we see these scores, our approach is to return PH to a normalized level and apply flushing type modalities like Marc-Pro and Normatec. Generally speaking, higher levels of acidity are associated with sessions scoring a 4.0 or greater. With TE we can see the level reached within Anaerobic Metabolism and prescribe the correct recovery strategy. TRAINING EFFECT (TE): During short duration sessions/practices the TRIMP value may not express how intense the session is or if we have exceeded the appropriate work period when training certain energy pathways.
I continue to view TRIMP as an important indicator of total work stress and include several additional metrics that provide more detail to the story of the athlete’s activity. I used the TRIMP measure heavily when I first began using the Firstbeat systems. We take value in knowing the accumulation of workload based on intensity and duration of a session.
TRIMP: Used as our accumulative workload metric. Our “Go To” Metrics are the following: (please note, in addition to our post-practice review of data we track real time metrics during practice to make adjustments and recommendations when a player is exceeding workloads and to look at their HR recovery response between drills.). – How do those metrics help with decision-making? * When you’re looking at real-time feedback or reviewing post-training reports, what are your “go-to” Firstbeat metrics? Team workload/intensity and duration of monitored practice times are shared with the coaching staff so they have useful information when planning the next workday and the yearly work to rest schedule. In San Jose our goal is to monitor every practice during the season, which includes pre-season training camp. Herein lies the need for in-season monitoring of workload and intensity through HR. A practice plan typically addresses all or parts of these areas, but what if the workload of that practice is too high and significant amounts of fatigue are caused the day before a game? When you have a limited amount of practice days during the year, a coaching staff needs to get the most out of the players tactically, emotionally, cognitively and physically. Given the compressed game schedule, travel schedule and requirements for mandatory days off per league rules, practice time is limited but still a valuable commodity. West coast teams will travel more than the east coast teams due to the proximity of franchise locations. Each team will commonly play 13-16 games per month with no consistency to the format of days they play. TRIMPS GAME REVIEW PROFESSIONAL
The NHL is one of the longest seasons in professional sports. How does the Firstbeat Sports Monitor platform support your work as a professional Strength and Conditioning Coach in the NHL? Additionally, SRPE is a simple and low-cost method that might be used for TL monitoring in handball.Interview between John Lally representing Firstbeat Technologies and PIVOT Sports & Mike Potenza Director of Strength & Conditioning San Jose Sharks and Kevin Neeld, Assistant Strength & Conditioning Coach San Jose Sharks The results suggest that different constructs seem to be measured by each load model. Shared variances of 13–35% were observed between TL methods comparisons. A moderate correlation was observed for Edwards’ Trimp vs. 
A large correlation was found between Edwards’ Trimp and distance covered (r=0.59).
An oscillatory feature was observed for the three methods of TL assessment (SRPE: 383☑59 A.U., Edwards’ Trimp: 252☗1 A.U., total distance: 3997☑291 m). Internal load models based on SRPE and Edwards’ Trimp were calculated. Distance covered, heart rate and session rating of perceived exertion were recorded during 12 training sessions in 14 youth women handball athletes (16.9☑.1 years). This study examined the association between different methods for training load (TL) monitoring during youth handball training.
0 kommentar(er)
